Life Insurance is seen as a 4 letter word.

Insurance, Leverage

There’s so much of bad mouthing on insurance of any kind. I have consistently maintained that you should be adequately covered.

The situation is so bad that even my insurance advisor was suggesting me a term plan when I was evaluating a whole life policy.

In my opinion, term policies are a low value method to cover risk and should be used as a primary method of insurance, especially when you are very young and starting on your life journey.

On the other hand whole life policies not only give you tax free returns while you’re alive – in India at least – they also ensure that your family gets a good coverage. In addition on these policies you can take a loan at much lower interest rates. A term policy will not allow these benefits.

So you’re getting a tax break for investing in insurance, you get a tax free amount after a certain period, your family is also protected and you can also take low interest rate loans.

The biggest thing is that you are ensuring that you are adequately mitigating risk and also ensuring predictable cashflow in the future.

When I was young I used to think of the insurance amount as a burden, but as I have grown older, I have realized its value more and more.

Till next time then.

Carpe Diem!!!

Fractional Reserve System

Banks, cash flow, Debt, Leverage, Liabilities

When I was a kid, I always wondered how banks operate. Yes I did know they take money from us and lend it to someone on a higher interest, compared to what they give us. The difference in the two helps them make money. Because they allow you to keep the money on “tap” they give almost negligible interest rates. On longer duration deposits they give a slightly higher rate of interest because the chance of the money being asked earlier is reduced.

While this is simple I still could not understand how banks could lend so much money and how defaulters could have so much money with them.

A few years back I was sharing a ride from Indore to Bhopal – two cities in the state of Madhya Pradesh in India – with a banker. During this 4 hour journey, I happened to get talking with him on the same query. His logic partially answered my question.

The logic was that at any point in time the banks don’t allow you to withdraw All the money from a savings bank account. So they will put clauses – that in case you need an ATM facility then you need to maintain a certain amount, if you need a cheque book then you have to maintain a certain minimum amount in the bank, otherwise they penalise you. Due to this there is always money available to the bank even in savings bank deposits which will not go out of the bank in most situations. This becomes one source of low value funds. In addition there are the long duration deposits etc.

This had partially answered my questions but I was still not able to get my mind to understand how these deposits can create such high value lending capabilities for banks.

I don’t know if you have heard this term Fractional Reserve System before. If you have, then the remaining part of the post will be uninteresting to you. I first read about this in the book Second Chance by Robert Kiyosaki. Then I did some research on Google, Wikipedia etc. This got me most of the answers.

So now over and above what the banker above told me, the banks are allowed to lend a “multiple” of their deposits of various kinds. The key word is multiple. To ensure that the banks don’t go “bust” in most countries they have to hold a certain amount of their deposits with a central bank so that there is always a safety net for the depositors in case the debtors default and a bank has a run on their money.

Due to the ability to lend multiples of the deposit rate , say just for argument sake 10 times the deposit rate – if a bank has 1 million retail customers who have to maintain a minimum deposit of $100 then they have $100 million (1m*100) as the amount which would generally always be available to the bank. Now because they are allowed to lend 10 times the deposit rate, they can therefore lend $100m *10 = $1000m.

Since they always get a much higher rate on lending, and they only pay out a much lower level of interest to the depositors, the difference is huge amount of money for the bank. So on the 100m they are paying 2% per annum – which will mean giving out 2m as cumulative interest to the depositors. On the other hand they may lend at 10%. So 10% of $1000m is $100m. So at a gross level the bank has just made $98m using your $100m. I am sure there are other expenses involved, I have used 10 times just for demonstration purposes.

The challenge for the bank is when people default on paying their loans and the amount is much higher than the deposits. Therefore banks ask for collateral to protect their downside.

This was such a huge revelation for me because this is such a huge cash generator. They have so much leverage on the money which you have lent to them with very little liabilities. The key in this is the ability of the bank to have a good process to understand risk on a loan. This is why I now remember in one his interviews Raamdeo Aggarwal of Motilal Oswal, mentioned that if you want to buy the shares of a bank look at their loan underwriting process. The stronger the process the better the bank in getting its money back and the higher the profits.

I get elated when I am able to solve a query which has been at the back of my head for such a long time.

Let me know if you have had Aha moments when a query which has been long standing gets solved.

Till next time then.

Carpe Diem!!!

Buying confidence with insurance

confidence, Fear, Insurance, Leverage, Risks

FEAR is generally caused by the unknown. What you are not sure off causes you to be uncertain. When you are uncertain you get fearful about the outcome.

Earlier I always used to talk about how investments would lead you to have the confidence to take the risks of life without being fearful .

However I have recently started analysing different kinds of risks that I face – so as we grow older, medical costs is a big issue. Next I have only one house in which I presently live – so there’s always the risk of a catastrophe that can hit.

I actually listed at least 5 or 6 different things which are high risks, that can suddenly wipe out my savings and investments.

Based on the ideas given by Garrett Gunderson, in his book Killing Sacred Cows, I have gone about figuring out if there’s insurance available to me to cover each of those risks.

While I knew about health insurance, I didn’t know about the concept of top-up that can add a quantum leap in your coverage at a very small premium. The caveat is that you should have the base medical insurance in place. Since I identified the risk and put a value to it, I was able to identify a product which would give me coverage to that risk.

Once you can list out all your risks and start putting a monetary value to them, chances are that you may also get a company who will be willing to cover the risk for you at a price. Once you have covered the monetary value of the possible risk, then its no longer a risk.

Insurance is a different kind of leverage, you are covering a large monetary risk by paying a small premium.

Once there is no risk, the fear reduces. Once fear reduces, you get the confidence to look at bigger things and aim for them. Insurance helps you get that confidence.

Till next time then.

Carpe Diem!!!

The 80/20 of a daily routine

Focus, Leverage, Unique Ability

I have been analyzing my daily routine. On a weekly basis if we were to just take 40 hours of work, then after a month of monitoring my daily activities I have realized that

1. I spend more than 30% of my time in peer to peer meetings and unscheduled internal calls

2. I spend another 30-35% of my time in emails

3. I spend about 15% in reviews / feedback sessions with my team .

4. About 5-7% is spent on meeting customers to understand what is happening at their end or to give presentations or to get feedback ….this is one of my Unique Abilities and I love interacting with customers.

5. I spend less than 10% on actual marketing activities like conceptualizing marketing messages, strategies etc.

The last item I am able to achieve with the focused thinking time that I keep writing about.

The other day I was listening to the Ultimate Entrepreneur podcast by Jay Abraham. He had a guest by the name of Dr. Alan Barnard who is a practitioner of Goldiratt’s Theory of Constraints.

In this podcast towards the end they speak about a new offering they’re bringing to the market which shows entrepreneurs how they can convert their existing top line into the bottom line in less than 4 years.

That’s what got me thinking. I have been talking so much about 80/20, prioritizing, small hinges move big doors etc. in my blogs. To actually be able to convert the top line that I get for the company into the bottom line I will need to focus sharper and sharper on the 80/20 of the 80/20 of the items which actually get me business. Items where I have high impact and where presently I am spending less than 15% of my time.

I am on the experiment to see how I can convert the amount of my present top line to become my bottom line in next few years. Will keep you posted.

Till next time then.

Carpe Diem!!!