Single Target Market – Determining the viability in B2B

B2B, Business, differentiation, Marketing, Marketing Stamina, persistence, segmentation, single target market

I have consistently been harping on the fact that you need to find a niche in the market and a market in the niche. Finding a market in the niche is the critical part in determining if the market is even worth looking at. This is not about prioritizing on the different niches. Its about discarding a niche all together. Please understand that B2B buying is generally not impulsive. Which means you need to play this game over a long term.

For priortising of niches we will have a separate discussion.

Criteria for the B2B segmentation / niche viability

Your average deal size – recurring or one time
Gross Margin
Number of addressable prospects in the niche

Lets look at bundles of 100 or 1000 addressable prospects and I will share a simple model to do a quick calculation of the viability of the market.

Lets say you have a B2B prospect base of 100 and each deal is worth $100000/- per annum recurring. Which means the whole market is worth $10m per year and over a 5 year period if you were to be able to pick up 20 clients you can get a revenue of more than $20m cumulative approx. That’s a good market to be in, because with referrals and other things put together this market may actually end up being very large. Even at a 20% gross margin in 5 years you would make about $4m.

On the other hand if your average size deal was only $1000/- per annum recurring, then the market in 5 years may not be more than $200 thousand. Even if you make 50% gross margins, you will make at the end of 5 years about $100K.

So depending on the size of your average revenue you decide if the size of the niche is viable. The same $1000 product in a niche which has 1000 prospects could be worthwhile over a 5 a year period if you were able to pick up an share of 20% of the clients.

I have found that looking at a bundle of less than 100 tends to be scary because you don’t know how many of the clients will actually move away from their incumbent vendors. From a 100 prospects, Dean Jackson’s inevitability principle will lead to around 20 prospects in 5 years coming your way because some incumbent will make errors and if you are in front of the customer on a regular basis they will end up calling you just because they see you as persistent. A lot of time people don’t have the marketing stamina to last that many years.

Try working with this model and let me know if you found this useful.

Till next time then.

Carpe Diem!!!

B2B Messaging – finding the most effective channel

B2B, Business, differentiation, differentiation, ideal customer, Marketing, Marketing Ecosystem, messaging, segmentation, single target market

In consumer items there are a lot of ways to reach a customer – television, print, social media etc. Depending on where your demographic audience is and how the psychographics work out, you could also use good old direct mail and leaflets and tele-callers.

In B2B markets there are unique challenges. There’s a massive fall in print magazine circulation especially the business focused magazines. Not sure how many people watch television to check out the next business strategy.

In the B2B market, mail does not reach the person on the desk, because a lot of times people don’t have a desk and are mobile. So the mail has to be collected by the person by going to the mail room. Since people don’t come to the office so often and with Covid19, even fewer are coming to office so no one visits the mail room and the mail you send does not reach the intended recipients. So if you are targeting professional services companies, financial services etc. I have found direct mail to be a tough ask.

On the other hand if you were looking at companies which were more into manufacturing, utilities etc. I would guess direct mail would work especially for the back office functions and factory / warehouse functions.

Email is a quick, free medium and that’s it very basic problem. In B2B all the people are inundated with mail and you get a fraction of a second on the mobile phone, before the person ignores or deletes your mail. That is if your mail even reaches the person’s mailbox, because the spam filters will block your mail if they even observe a single item in the mail which smells of spam.

Before the pandemic started, webinars was a good way to get people to join you and hear your message, but I am observing a definite sense of exhaustion with webinars. The registration and attendance and company sponsored webinars has fallen dramatically. It may still be possible to get some attendance if the webinar is being run by an industry body or an independent analyst or a reputed media group with some respected industry veterans.

As a B2B marketer I am always looking out for some effective ways to get in front my audience. By ensuring that I target a “single target market”, and try and target only my ideal customer profile, I try to learn from each interaction that we have with a client and see how we can incorporate that learning into our next interaction. Its always a good idea to send a personal email to a person so that the spam filters don’t think you are spamming. You try to use as much knowledge you have of the industry to make this email so that the person reading it finds it useful.

Please let me know in case you have found any other method to reach your prospects in B2B in the comments below.

Till next time then.

Carpe Diem!!!

Integrated Product Management

differentiation, Marketing, Marketing Ecosystem, Positioning, Product Management, single target market

I learnt a very important concept yesterday while watching a video of Brendon Burchard from the ilovemarketing mastery program by Joe Polish.

He was explaining about how he strategizes a book launch. A book launch is another form of a product launch with the product over here being a book.

I have been in Product Management for quite a long time and some of the concepts that he spoke about were standard.

However one thing which got me thinking and which you also need to understand if you are into Product Management is differentiating between ancillary products / services versus next set of products / services which are higher up in aspiration but are however part of a common ecosystem.

As per Brendon an ear phone, phone cover are ancillary while the iPhone, the iPad and the Mac all part of the integrated product set which Apple sell all the 3 items to their customer base all the time.

So even though Android is there with the so called “open” environment with a huge ecosystem, with full fledged interoperability and there are so many companies who sell more phones than Apple but no company makes as much money whether its with phones, tablets and computers.

This got me thinking. If you look at other companies who are really have ruled a lot of industries – the integrated product suite does come to mind.

IBM had their set of products and services which were generally all integrated. That was the biggest value to large customers who did not want the hassle of integrating products from different vendors. Customers could easily buy another set of products with a clear knowledge that they were safe because it was IBM. So even though a lot of companies came out with so called “open-systems” and individual discreet products, IBM had their clientele clearly defined and have been making a lot of money.

This has got me thinking. While we do think in terms of the next set of products/services that we should have in our suite, to clearly have an integrated suite where the customer has the comfort as well as the aspiration to take the next product from us needs to be thought off. We also need to clearly differentiate between ancillaries and next level of products so that we have 2 sets of revenue streams.

Pls tell me if you have had success with this kind of an integrated product suite. I would like to know your inputs in the comments section below.

Till next time then.

Carpe Diem!!!

B2B messaging – Using Triggers – 2

B2B, Business, differentiation, Marketing, messaging, persistence, single target market, Triggers

Yesterday I wrote about one of the best triggers that I have found in B@B messaging, when someone joins in a new role from outside the company in the executive position.

There are multiple other triggers that can be used based on the environment the company is operating in.

New regulation / compliances in the industry which everyone has to comply with especially if followed with a time limit
Going out / End of Life – of a license/regulation – again if there is a time limit it is even more critical
Entry of a new competitor in the market
Entry of a new technology
Impact of an event on a competitor and how it can apply to them
Global crisis and many more….

The reason I addressed the “new joinee trigger” as an independent post yesterday was because I have found that to be the most effective. With the above triggers the challenges are seen as more long term and people may not react to your messaging immediately.

Apart from the timing issue the other challenge is again related to targeting the right person in the organsiational matrix with the messaging for the above.

If you have been following my blog, I have given so many tactics for messaging whether its with dissonance or now with triggers or earlier with pain areas and aspiration areas.

The reason you have to test for so many different types of messaging is because you don’t know what kind of messaging will invoke a response from which prospect. You have to keep persisting with trying various options continuously.

So keep testing.

Till next time then

Carpe Diem!!!